When approached by NewsForge, Microsoft declined to comment on the incident. On 27 January 2006, the developers responsible for maintaining the ReactOS code repository disabled access after a meeting was held to discuss the allegations. Alex Ionescu, the author of the code, asserted that while the Windows XP binary in question was indeed disassembled and studied, the code was not merely copy-pasted, but reimplemented the reason why the functions were identical, Ionescu claimed, was because there was only one possible way to implement the function. Comparing this function to disassembled binaries from Windows XP, Birr argued that the BadStack function was simply copy-pasted from Windows XP, given that they were identical. The code that Birr disputed involved the function BadStack in syscall.S, as well as other unspecified items. A claim was made on 17 January 2006 by developer Hartmut Birr on the ReactOS developers mailing list (ros-dev) that ReactOS contained code derived from disassembling Microsoft Windows. In order to avoid copyright prosecution, ReactOS had to be expressly completely distinct and non-derivative from Windows, a goal that needed very careful work. In 2002, the ReactOS Foundation was established in Moscow with Maxim Osowski and Aleksey Bragin as executive officers and Vladimir Bragin, Saveliy Tretiakov and Alexey Ivanov on the board of directors. While the term "OS" stood for operating system, the term "react" referred to the group's dissatisfaction with – and reaction to – Microsoft's monopolistic position. The name ReactOS was coined during an IRC chat. The project began development in February 1998 by creating the basis for a new NT kernel and basic drivers. In creating the new project, a new name, ReactOS, was chosen. The revived project sought to duplicate the functionality of Windows NT. As a result, the project members, led by then coordinator Jason Filby, joined together to revive the project. While FreeWin95 had started out with high expectations, there still had not been any builds released to the public by the end of 1997. The project stalled in discussions of the design of the system. 1.3 Google Summer of Code participationĪround 1996, a group of free and open-source software developers started a project called FreeWin95 to implement a clone of Windows 95.ReactOS, as part of the FOSS ecosystem, re-uses and collaborates with many other FOSS projects, most notably the Wine project, which presents a Windows compatibility layer for Unix-like operating systems. The project partially implements Windows API functionality and has been ported to the AMD64 processor architecture. ReactOS is primarily written in C, with some elements, such as ReactOS File Explorer, written in C++. However, many Windows applications are working, such as Adobe Reader 9.3, GIMP 2.6, and LibreOffice 5.4. (As of February 2022), it is still considered feature-incomplete alpha software, and is therefore recommended by the developers only for evaluation and testing purposes. ReactOS has been in development since 1996. ReactOS has been noted as a potential open-source drop-in replacement for Windows and for its information on undocumented Windows APIs. ReactOS mainly competes against computer operating systems such as Microsoft's Windows and Canonical's Ubuntu. ReactOS is a free and open-source operating system for amd64/i686 personal computers intended to be binary-compatible with computer programs and device drivers developed for Microsoft Windows. We don't have anywhere near the manpower needed to code and test to the extent that MS does.ReactOS 0.4.14 running the Firefox Web browser If the goal of ROS was to play catch-up with MS, it would be impossible. ROS exists to provide a free alternative to Windows, and also to allow software to continue to run that MS has left in the dust. ROS must get Win32 API solid before targeting anything else.īut even that isn't the true picture. ROS doesn't have to "support" Windows 8 to support its applications. Unless I'm mistaken, Windows applications rely on either the Win16 API, the Win32 API, the Win64 API, or. Windows 8 will likely be next os target if it does well anyway(since microsoft is dropping support for server 2003 soon im guessing little more then 2 years after windows 8 rtm)if windows 8 turns out to be a flop i guess target changes to windows 7Įtherway target wont stay windows server 2003 much longer that os is getting dated and not even microsoft will support it soonĪs long as you're okay with wild and unfounded hypothesizing, sure.īut you're still missing the big picture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |